Iannis Miletich vs Edoardo Zanada Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do Zanada and Miletich compare in terms of second serve performance? Zanada has a recent second serve win rate of 35.4%, while Miletich manages 43.21%, indicating a stronger second serve by Miletich.
• What about their return game effectiveness? Zanada excels in return games, winning 53.5% of opponents' second serve points compared to Miletich's 44.96%. In first serve returns, Zanada has an edge with 37.67% over Miletich's 29.18%.
• In high-pressure situations, such as breakpoints, how do the players perform? Miletich has the upper hand here, saving 55.42% of breakpoints against him, while Zanada saves 44.14%.
• Over the last year, Zanada has a slightly better win rate at 65.22% compared to Miletich's 58.46%, which suggests more consistent performance overall.
• On clay, which is the best surface for both players, Zanada has a slight advantage with a 62% win rate, while Miletich has a 60% win ratio on the same surface.
• Examining the level of tournaments played, Zanada has shown better performance in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K with a win rate of 66.67%, compared to Miletich's 59.38% in the same category.
• Considering the average rank of their opponents, Zanada has faced tougher competition with opponents ranked at 214.33 on average, a more challenging lineup compared to Miletich's opponents averaging a rank of 316.68.
• In deciding sets, Zanada dominates with an 86% win rate in the last 12 months, surpassing Miletich's 59% in these crucial moments.
• Can Zanada's break point conversion affect the match outcome? Yes, Zanada has a significant advantage here, converting 50% of breakpoints, while Miletich converts just 28.48%.

Editorial Prediction (August 25, 2025, UTC):

As we analyze the head-to-head tennis stats, Miletich shows superiority in second serve performance and handling breakpoints, offering a slight advantage over Zanada in these aspects.

Nevertheless, Zanada's proficiency in return games, especially on second serve returns, along with a solid historical performance in deciding sets, suggests a robustness under certain match circumstances.

Although both players share strengths on clay surfaces, Zanada's slightly higher win percentage on this surface, coupled with experience against more challenging opponents and better breakpoint conversion, might tilt the scales in their favor.

Based on these facts, Zanada emerges as the more likely victor in the upcoming match, given their comprehensive performance advantages.